Facts given by Professional of their field backed up by peer scrutiny published in their own words.
Somewhat specific but ussually this is what i look for. facts are obvious, if i see i feel or something along those lines i generally move forward with more scrutiny. A professional is someone with some form of recongnized accrediation or experince in their field. For peer scrutiny i feel it's important because if its a topic i know nothing about i probably with assume everything they say is fact, when they could jsut be spouting nonsense. With peer scrutiny or a disenting opinion i know that others in their field either accept what they propose or are willing to take the time to argue a counter point adding some form a of validity to their arguments. Finally regarding it being published in their own words, i think it is important that what they say is not filtered by someone who may or may not have the same opinion, or worse yet not understand what they are editing on to wrongly relay information.
No comments:
Post a Comment